AI Rate Professor

English

Elizabeth Applegate

ENGL101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take her only if and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnbalanced gradingGroup work issuesFunnyAttendance matters
  • The and group project problems.
  • The course seems low in content difficulty but frustrating in .
  • , but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A does not look easy because grades can and group credit problems.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The course content seems manageable, but the structure and itself.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The tag says skipping class means you will not pass, so .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The because grading and group work felt unfair despite her humor.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The review says she fixes grades later, but the and group credit are still a major problem.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as heavy, but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is described as funny, but the course management and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review focuses on assignments and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but a frustrating class structure with unfair group credit and uneven assignment values.

Main concern

Grades and group submission mechanics.

What students said

“Group work was terrible, she only gave credit to one person in the group: the one who turned it in.”
ENGL101
“Very unbalanced scale.”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Group work was terrible, she only gave credit to one person in the group: the one who turned it in.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in grading and group work; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Other than that, she was really funny.”

⚖️

25/100

“Very unbalanced scale.”

📌 Course Structure

35/100

“ and worth like 5 points or THE most important assignment and worth 200 points.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Very unbalanced scale.
  • At the end, she fixes grades, but and worth like 5 points or THE most important assignment and worth 200 points.

Theme 2

👥 About Group Work

  • Group work was terrible, she only gave credit to one person in the group: the one who turned it in.
  • Other than that, she was really funny.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the evidence is narrow and weak.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values