AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

. Sutherland

PHIL101 · PHIL103 · PHIL202 · PHILO100 · PHIL102 · PHIL100110 · PHIL104 · PHIL100 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take . Sutherland only if you want an and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ADisorganized NotesBoring LecturesConfusing TeachingExtra Credit
  • In-person reviews repeatedly describe the class as very easy to pass or earn an A in.
  • Teaching quality is weak because many students call the lectures rambling, boring, and disorganized.
  • The single online review is , and grade-heavy exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

with , though the online review warns that few graded items make mistakes costly.

The easy-A evidence is overwhelmingly in person, while the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The content is usually described as easy, but and rambling lectures add friction.

In-person reviews mostly call the course easy, while the and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

as mandatory, but students say notes from class are important for tests.

In-person reviews mention note-taking value, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

but often advise against her for actual learning or .

Both formats include concerns, with and in-person criticism focused on teaching quality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Most , and , despite one online tough-grader report.

Format shift

, while the single online review describes tough grading.

Workload

Light

75/100

, or homework tasks, while the online class has few but high-stakes assignments.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds light, but online workload is risky because each graded item matters more.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students repeatedly describe her as confusing, boring, rambling, and .

Format shift

In-person comments provide most teaching evidence, and the online review does not improve the teaching picture.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

, and finals rather than a single dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence leans quiz and , while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students usually found the class easy but , and weak organization.

Main concern

Students may get the grade without learning much.

What students said

“ but not to learn”
PHILO100
“Hard to NOT pass this class.”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The lone , and timed quizzes and exams that heavily affect the grade.

Main concern

A few timed assessments can heavily damage the grade.

What students said

“she is a so getting a low score will really hurt your chances of getting an A”
PHIL102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with online timed quizzes and exams but as easy and based on notes.

Timed Online QuizzesTimed Online ExamsTests From NotesFinal Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

47/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or closed-book policies.

Tests From NotesFinal Mentioned
“ .”
PHIL100
“ .”
PHIL100

Online

The online review explicitly reports timed quizzes and exams with many questions and high grade weight.

Timed QuizzesTimed ExamsGrade-Heavy Exams
“quizzes and exams are timed around 30-40 minutes”
PHIL102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but not to learn”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Her note taking is probably by far the ”

📈 Easy Grade

86/100

“Hard to NOT pass this class.”

⚖️

78/100

“The note are very confusing, writing all over the board making it hard to comprehend. The good news is this professor gives that will boost a D to an A.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • I pretty much slept through every lecture and still got an A.
  • if you're interested in actually learning about ! but if you only want an easy A then for !

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her notes or so disorganized because she jumps from one topic to another and back to that topic.
  • shes a horrible teacher her notes are so unclear.
  • and hard to understand

Theme 3

📝

  • she will tell you exactly what is on the test.
  • .
  • quizzes and exams are timed around 30-40 minutes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 23 reviews across many years, with consistent themes about easy grades and .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 57
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL1009 reviews
PHIL1045 reviews
PHILO1003 reviews
PHIL1022 reviews
PHIL1001101 review
Show 3 more courses
PHIL1011 review
PHIL1031 review
PHIL2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values