AI Rate Professor

English

Mark Milinich

ENG100 · ENG103 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you can , and manage frequent essays independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear promptsMandatory attendance pressureMany papersEasy graderDisorganized records
  • All reviews are negative and no .
  • , and little online support, making missed classes especially costly.
  • , but and poor organization make the course frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades may be lenient, but the A still costs effort because students report , and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content may not be extremely hard, but and frequent writing make the course harder to navigate.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

because prompts are given verbally in class and missing one day can leave students lost.

online evidence available.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students do not recommend him because the class is unclear, paper-heavy, and .

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students say he grades easy, though grade tracking and assignment clarity are major problems.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The workload is heavy because students report weekly or near-weekly essays and many papers.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe rambling lectures, unclear verbal prompts, poor online support, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The course , and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe unclear lectures and , and poor use of online resources.

Main concern

Students can fall behind quickly because and unclearly in class.

What students said

“if you're not in class for even one day then you end up lost”
ENG100
“ .”
ENG103
“He grades easy BUT ”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam, quiz, midterm, final, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterm, final, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you're not in class for even one day then you end up lost with no idea as to what you are doing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Professor was a nice guy but his lectures didn't seem to get to a point.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“ .”

⚖️

78/100

“He grades easy BUT because he told me I never turned 4 of them in but he just forgot to put in the grades.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He verbally explains writing prompts, usually unclear with not much information.
  • He rambles on and on . . .
  • .

Theme 2

📝 About Papers And Work

  • .
  • we had an essay about every 1-2 weeks.
  • So many papers

Theme 3

🚪 And Access

  • if you're not in class for even one day then you end up lost with no idea as to what you are doing.
  • no online usage aside from emails.
  • you have to show up to know the prompt.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is small with only 3 reviews, but the complaints are specific and highly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1032 reviews
ENG1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1