AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Christopher Gillotte

MATH155 · MATH60 · MATH1342 · MATH140 · MATH114 · MATH80A · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself difficult math with little support and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast and Confusing LecturesTough GraderHeavy HomeworkPoor SupportExam Mismatch
  • Students , and poorly aligned with .
  • Grades are difficult to earn because , and as harsh and unpredictable.
  • Both online and others to avoid the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students , and many withdrawals or low grades.

The online review is negative, while the grade accessibility.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course content feels hard because , and assignments often exceed what was taught.

Both formats describe unclear teaching, but content delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students say attendance is effectively required because missing class makes an .

and comments; the single online review does not discuss attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend him because , and harshly graded.

The online review also says not to take him, matching the stronger in-person pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call him a and , and low grades.

Format shift

the online review also reporting a poor grade outcome.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews mention lots of , and spending extreme time on a few problems.

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence is concentrated in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students consistently describe unclear lectures, poor support, disrespectful responses, and material that does not match assessments.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Students emphasize tests, quizzes, and exams as the decisive assessments, often saying they do not match lectures or homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students consistently report fast , and exams that do not match instruction.

Main concern

Students say the class is and hard to pass.

What students said

“His lectures do not match up with the .”
MATH155
“does not give a study guide for test”
MATH80A
“ ”
MATH114

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review says lectures made little sense and the class was a bad experience.

Main concern

The and poor outcomes.

What students said

“He makes no sense when he lectures and expects you to know what he's already explaining.”
MATH80A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult exams with little review support and poor alignment with lectures, but they .

Hard TestsNo Study GuideExams Do Not Match LectureCalculator Not Allowed

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, lecture mismatch, and one calculator restriction, but not clear proctoring or open-book rules.

Hard TestsNo Study GuideExams Do Not Match LectureCalculator Not Allowed
“gives no reviews for tests”
MATH1342
“His lectures do not match up with the .”
MATH155
“doesn't let you use a calculator for exams”
MATH80A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser use.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He is everywhere with his lessons.”

⚖️

10/100

“When it comes to homework you HAVE to do all of it to receive a 4 anything less is a D.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he goes way to fast
  • He makes no sense when he lectures and expects you to know what he's already explaining.
  • Lectures are hard to keep up with

Theme 2

📉 About Difficulty and Grades

  • His lectures do not match up with the .
  • does not give a study guide for test
  • For the on your own

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • !
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 14 reviews are highly consistent, detailed, and strongly negative across multiple courses and years, with only one online review.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH1146 reviews
MATH1553 reviews
MATH80A2 reviews
MATH13421 review
MATH1401 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1