AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

Dejun Li

ENGT262 · ENG262 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

Take him if you want a achievable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorHighly recommendedEasy gradingHelpful feedbackStudent favorite
  • Students describe him as unusually caring, helpful, and mentor-like.
  • All reported grades are A+, and difficulty ratings are very low.
  • The evidence is extremely positive but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

All reported grades are A+ with very low difficulty, suggesting the A is highly attainable in his class.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students report very low difficulty and strong support, making the course feel accessible even in engineering.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it consistently describes an easy, supportive experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every reviewer strongly recommends him through perfect ratings and unusually enthusiastic praise.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

All recorded grades are A+ and one review says the class is graded by few things.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Low difficulty ratings and few graded items suggest a light workload for the reward.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students describe him as , and more like a mentor than a teacher.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention group projects and few graded items, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are uniformly enthusiastic, , and .

Main concern

The sample is small, so confidence is limited despite perfect reviews.

What students said

“ .”
ENGT262
“Great Instructor who deserves a raise.”
ENGT262
“THIS MAN DESERVES A RAISE.”
ENG262

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“feels more like a mentor than a teacher.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Value

95/100

“Graded by few things”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • this professor is amazing.
  • Great Instructor who deserves a raise.
  • THIS MAN DESERVES A RAISE.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • actually cares about their students.
  • more than willing to help and is always there
  • feels more like a mentor than a teacher.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Graded by few things
  • Group projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The reviews are detailed enough and perfectly consistent, but there are only three total reviews.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGT2622 reviews
ENG2621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values