AI Rate Professor

English

Geoffrey Aguirre

ENG100 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice personalityDisorganized lecturesRandom cold-callingPhone leniencyParticipation matters
  • The only and relaxed about phone use.
  • The same review says lectures feel scattered and confusing.
  • Randomly calling on students may bother students who dislike participation pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

There is no grade evidence, but the moderate difficulty rating suggests a manageable class if .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course does not sound intellectually extreme, but confusion from scattered teaching makes it harder to follow.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation matters and random cold-calling suggest attendance helps, but the review does not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The because the class felt disorganized and confusing.

The recommendation score is based .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The review does not clearly describe grading strictness, so .

Format shift

No online evidence exists, and the .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The review gives no strong workload warning, so the workload appears moderate by default.

Format shift

Only the and it does not discuss assignments or reading load.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He is described as nice, but students reportedly did not always understand what he was talking about.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

No format difference can be assessed because only one in-person review exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review describes a and confusing.

Main concern

Students may struggle because the instruction feels all over the place.

What students said

“ and does not care too much about phone use.”
ENG100
“it feels like he is all over the place and sometimes the students did not even know what he was talking about”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the difficulty.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , finals, or proctoring policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“it feels like he is all over the place and sometimes the students did not even know what he was talking about”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and participation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Although he is really cool and the place and sometimes the students did not even know what he was talking about”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ and does not care too much about phone use.”

🙋 Participation Pressure

58/100

“Calls on random people in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and does not care too much about phone use.
  • it feels like he is all over the place and sometimes the students did not even know what he was talking about

Theme 2

🙋 About Class Participation

  • Calls on random people in class.
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

, so the analysis has low reliability despite a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values