AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

Curtis Husted

MTT78 · MTT68 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a knowledgeable technical instructor and are willing to attend and pay attention.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeableClear gradingGood feedbackRespectedAttendance matters
  • Students praise Husted's strong material knowledge and software expertise.
  • Success depends on listening, paying attention, and not skipping class.
  • The evidence is very positive but limited to only two reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A seems attainable if students attend and pay attention, but the course is not described as effortless.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The technical material seems manageable with attention, but the difficulty ratings suggest moderate challenge.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One review explicitly warns that skipping class will prevent success, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

because he knows the material and .

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grading seems fair and pay attention.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload appears moderate because only a few quizzes are mentioned, but attendance and attention are important.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students describe him as , and strong with technical software.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment evidence mainly mentions a few quizzes, with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a if students pay attention.

Main concern

Skipping class appears risky because the course depends on listening and staying engaged.

What students said

“listen to what he has to say and you'll do well.”
MTT68
“Great Teacher, very good with Verisurf software!”
MTT78

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a few quizzes that are easy to pass with attention, but do not .

Few QuizzesPay Attention To Pass

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but does not clearly prove exam format, open-book status, or proctoring rules.

Few QuizzesPay Attention To Pass
“ but if you pay attention you'll pass easily”
MTT68

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great knowledge of material and program .listen to what he has to say and you'll do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching knowledge and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Great Teacher, very good with Verisurf software!”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“Great knowledge of material and program .listen to what he has to say and you'll do well.”

📋

25/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great knowledge of material and program .listen to what he has to say and you'll do well.
  • Great Teacher, very good with Verisurf software!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but if you pay attention you'll pass easily

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the but weakly supported.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MTT681 review
MTT781 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values