AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Emily Segwick

PHIL101 · LOGIC106 · PHIL106 · PHY101 · PHIL100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Segwick only if and self-teaching in exchange for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy gradingHeavy readingBoring lecturesOpen-book testsSelf-learning
  • several find Segwick fair or smart, while others call the lectures boring and .
  • Grades can be easier than the content because of , and leniency in some in-person reviews.
  • The online review says the class requires substantial self-learning and real understanding, even though online access helps.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Grades can be manageable because of , and leniency, but the and understanding.

, while the online review stresses self-learning and tougher understanding-based grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Philosophy and logic concepts are often described as hard .

Online evidence emphasizes self-learning, while in-person evidence ranges from easy PHIL101 to very challenging logic.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is encouraged for participation and , but reviews do not clearly prove a .

and participation, while the online review does not describe attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

grading, but lecture quality complaints create real hesitation.

The online review is cautiously positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Several reviews mention fair grading, major , leniency, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews support leniency more strongly, while the and examples.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is moderate to heavy because students mention lots of reading, self-learning, and overwhelming information.

Format shift

Online workload sounds heavier due to self-learning, while in-person workload varies by course.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Teaching is inconsistent, with praise for fairness and intelligence offset by repeated complaints about boring or .

Format shift

The online review calls her good but self-directed, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment , and reading-based understanding.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions discussions and understanding, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and open-book tests while others strongly criticize boring, monotonous lectures.

Main concern

Several students say the lectures are boring or hard to comprehend.

What students said

“ lectures.”
PHIL101
“ . YOU'LL FALL ASLEEP!”
PHIL101
“Very fair with grades, however her class is very hard to comprehend.”
PHY101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says Segwick is good but , and real understanding.

Main concern

You cannot coast through discussions without knowing the material.

What students said

“the class requires a lot of self- learning.”
PHIL106
“Not the class you can easily bs for credit.”
PHIL106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Overall exam style appears student-friendly mainly because and easy quizzes, while online exam rules are not clearly proven.

Open-Book TestsExtra CreditEasy QuizzesStudy From Book

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and easy quizzes, making the assessment style more forgiving.

Open-Book TestsEasy QuizzesExtra Credit
“ lectures.”
PHIL101
“ .”
PHIL106
“quizes are easy if you pay attention in class.”
PHIL106

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Segwick is a good teacher but the class requires a lot of self- learning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Prof Segwick is a good teacher but the class requires a lot of self- learning.”

📈

76/100

“She is good teacher. This class is easy & she gives constant grade updates. Also, she gives major .”

⚠️ Lecture Risk

48/100

“ . YOU'LL FALL ASLEEP!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof Segwick is a good teacher but the class requires a lot of self- learning.
  • Subject is boring but she tries to keep the class awake.
  • She's great as a person, but she is hard in her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and correct use of examples, you really got to know your stuff.
  • This class is easy & she gives constant grade updates.
  • Very fair with grades, however her class is very hard to comprehend.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • lectures.
  • .
  • quizes are easy if you pay attention in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews cover multiple years and courses, but many are old and opinions conflict strongly.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1013 reviews
PHIL1063 reviews
LOGIC1061 review
PHIL1001 review
PHY1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values