AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Isaac Elgindi

MATH60 · MATH80B · MATH112 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning independently and handling inconsistent instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProInconsistent TeachingHomework HeavyTough GradingParticipation MattersHard to Follow
  • Student experiences are .
  • Several comments describe unclear explanations, rude behavior, or .
  • The course appears risky for students who need structured help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Grades range from A to D, and comments mention lots of , and difficulty getting help.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is made harder by long note-heavy lectures, limited hands-on practice, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Tags indicate participation matters and skipping class may lead to failure, but the .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Only one of three students recommends him, while two give strong warnings about teaching and grading.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

One review directly calls him picky with grading, and the grade spread includes D and C outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews mention lots of homework and long note-heavy lectures, making the workload feel demanding.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

One student found him patient and excellent, but two students report unclear explanations, poor support, or rude behavior.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is in-person only and strongly mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention online homework, participation, pop quizzes, and class lectures, but .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

outweighed by concerns about unclear teaching and grading.

Main concern

Students may struggle if and .

What students said

“He isn't a professor I would recommend to someone who can get lost easily.”
MATH112
“ .”
MATH60
“He is very picky with grading.”
MATH80B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove the .

Pop QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove midterm, final, proctoring, or book policy.

Pop QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH80B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He isn't a professor I would recommend to someone who can get lost easily.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Lectures were mainly 2 hours of note-taking and no hands-on classwork.”

⚖️

28/100

“He is very picky with grading.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I felt like he never really elaborated on some of the material if you were to ask.
  • He cares so much about his class actually comprehending the material.
  • his accent did make it difficult to understand him.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It didn't help that the , and if we had questions.
  • He is very picky with grading.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three older reviews show detailed but conflicting experiences, giving moderate credibility with .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1121 review
MATH601 review
MATH80B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values