AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Vanessa Kettering

PSYCH326 · PSCYH251 · PSYCH210 · PSYC210 · PSYCH251 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are ready to teach yourself with little useful guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Taught RequiredUnclear TeachingPoor OrganizationUseless Study GuidesNot Recommended
  • Students but cannot teach effectively.
  • Many reviews say students must learn from the book or on their own.
  • Study guides, quizzes, and as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even when the class content is not described as and poor study support make good grades require heavy self-teaching.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The class content itself is sometimes described as not hard, but .

, so there is no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules or .

The , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because , and forced to learn alone.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

, and poor study guides suggest grading feels strict and unpredictable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention , and tests with poor preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Reviews repeatedly say , and leaves students to learn on their own.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and study guides, suggesting a mix of work and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, citing unclear lectures, poor organization, and self-teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is having to learn the course independently because instruction is unreliable.

What students said

“ !!! Does not understsand material and the class basically learns on their own.”
PSYC210
“ as because most of it we learn on our own.”
PSCYH251
“No study guides.. you're on your own”
PSYCH210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes appear poorly supported by study materials, but reviews do .

Quizzes MentionedTests MentionedStudy Guides UnhelpfulReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests with weak study support, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book rules.

Quizzes MentionedTests MentionedStudy Guides Unhelpful
“She stated in the beginning of class that we don't need to .”
PSYCH210
“Her study guides are useless because it doesn't even cover half of whats on the test so why give us one.”
PSYCH251
“She did not give a and she didn't present enough material.”
PSYCH210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! Does not understsand material and the class basically learns on their own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Does not know how to teach whatsoever.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ .”

📚 Self Teaching

28/100

“might as because most of it we learn on our own.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's nice but is a really bad teacher.
  • !!! Does not understsand material and the class basically learns on their own.
  • unorganized and not helpful

Theme 2

📈

  • Her study guides are useless because it doesn't even cover half of whats on the test so why give us one.
  • She did not give a and she didn't present enough material.
  • Added on assignments and small projects throughout the quarter with .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • No study guides.. you're on your own
  • So many times we, as students, have to correct HER!
  • as because most of it we learn on our own.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

teaching, weak organization, and low recommendation.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSYCH2104 reviews
PSYCH2512 reviews
PSCYH2511 review
PSYC2101 review
PSYCH3261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values