AI Rate Professor

Economics

Gerardo Nebbia

ECON202 · ECON201 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

, but if strong teaching quality matters most.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AVery Light WorkloadTake-Home ExamsInconsistent TeachingFree Textbook
  • Students repeatedly describe the class as extremely easy with and .
  • Teaching quality is highly inconsistent, with some students praising interesting lectures and others saying they learned little.
  • The deep economics instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Multiple students call him an easy A, , and describe easy multiple-choice or .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly describe the course as easy and simple, though .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

because reviews mention missed classes and very few required tasks, with .

and is indirect.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and low workload, but mixed teaching quality prevents a stronger recommendation.

, and there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly , and an easy A path.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

95/100

Reviews mention , and student-chosen due dates.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students praise his lectures and care, while others say he misses class, confuses students, and teaches poorly.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to vary , and few graded items.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews consistently describe an easy class with light workload, but teaching quality ranges from excellent to very poor.

Main concern

Students may get an easy grade while learning less than expected.

What students said

“if you are looking for an easy A, go for it.”
ECON201
“Easy Teacher, No tests or :)!”
ECON201
“I learned more from wikipedia than I did from this guy.”
ECON202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to student-friendly in-person assessments, including easy multiple-choice or and very few graded tasks.

Easy Multiple ChoiceTake-Home ExamsOne PaperFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and in-class exams for students not using MyEconLab.

Easy Multiple ChoiceTake-Home ExamsIn-Class ExamsOne Paper
“ .”
ECON202
“ and a paper that was based on the movie industry.”
ECON202
“we have to suffer taking the exams in class!”
ECON201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you are looking for an easy A, go for it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching consistency. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy A Path

92/100

“if you are looking for an easy A, go for it.”

🪶 Workload

95/100

“Easy Teacher, No tests or :)!”

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“I learned more from wikipedia than I did from this guy.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Professor nebbia its the easiest instructor you would ever have.
  • if you are looking for an easy A, go for it.
  • Easy Teacher, No tests or :)!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Has interesting lectures and shows the relevancy of econ to todays current events.
  • His lectures confuse the students and himself.
  • He is the .

Theme 3

📝

  • .
  • and a paper that was based on the movie industry.
  • The class basically voted on when the due dates were for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

There are 10 reviews with recurring themes, but many are old and opinions on teaching quality conflict.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ECON2015 reviews
ECON2025 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values