AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Larry Ambriz

ACCT131 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid Larry Ambriz unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the textbook while still attending class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo LecturesMandatory AttendanceSelf-Taught ClassEasy WorkPoor Teaching
  • The only review says attendance is mandatory despite no meaningful lectures.
  • The course may be easy if .
  • Teaching quality is described as very poor, with no recommendation from the reviewer.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The course sounds easy for students who do the work, but the lack of teaching creates a .

Evidence comes only from one in person review, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The class appears academically manageable, but students must learn the material independently from the textbook.

Evidence comes only from one in person review, with no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

though the reviewer says there are .

Evidence comes only from one in person review, with no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The because the class is easy but the teaching is described as horrible.

Evidence comes only from one in person review, with no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

The reviewer calls him easy if students complete the work, suggesting lenient or .

Format shift

Only one in person review supports this, so confidence is limited.

Workload

Light

75/100

The workload seems manageable because the course is called easy if the work is done.

Format shift

Only one in person review mentions workload, and there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

The reviewer says he gives and is horrible at teaching anything.

Format shift

Only one in person review supports this judgment, but the language is direct and severe.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review mentions doing the work and using the textbook, with .

Format shift

There is no online evidence, and the in person review .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in person review describes an easy but almost entirely self-taught accounting class with .

Main concern

because the reviewer says there are .

What students said

“Doesn't give a single lecture but .”
ACCT131
“Definitely a self taught class with just the textbook.”
ACCT131

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the format, or final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The one in person review does .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doesn't give a single lecture but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Easy professor if you do the work but horrible at teaching you anything”

📌

5/100

“Doesn't give a single lecture but .”

📚 Self-Teaching Burden

70/100

“Definitely a self taught class with just the textbook.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't give a single lecture but .
  • Definitely a self taught class with just the textbook.
  • Easy professor if you do the work but horrible at teaching you anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy professor if you do the work but horrible at teaching you anything
  • Definitely a self taught class with just the textbook.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is vivid but too limited for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values