AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Richard Cameron

TALONMARKS · JOUR121 · JOURNALISM · JOUR100 · INTROTOMEDIA · JOUNALISM · JOURNALISM103 · NEWSPRODUCTION · JOURN · J100 · JOUR107 · JOURN100 · JOURNALISM105 · INTROTOMASS · NEWSPRODUCT · JOUR101 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you are committed to journalism and , and strict grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized AssignmentsHeavy HomeworkHarsh GradingMixed TeachingGroup Projects
  • Students repeatedly , and .
  • Some students like his passion and say the class can be manageable if you read and keep up.
  • Grading and projects are the main risks, especially for students taking the class only for general education.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A , and surviving strict grading, though a few students found it easy when they kept up.

Online evidence is limited and highlights project risk, while and heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The journalism content is not always intellectually extreme, but , and .

Online comments emphasize structure and confusion, while basics to difficult summer and project-heavy sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance seems useful because lectures and notes may contain quiz and test answers, but .

In-person comments support attending class for notes and passing, while online comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Many students warn against taking him because of , and harsh grading despite some positive comments about his personality.

Online reviews are mixed with only two examples, while and a smaller group of supporters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

, and major projects that can damage the .

Format shift

Online grading concerns focus on the final group project, while and tricky tests.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and tedious assignments.

Format shift

Both formats mention workload, but buried in assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He is often described as nice and passionate, but many students say .

Format shift

Online comments give some credit for email responses, while in-person comments are more polarized and include many severe teaching complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and major projects rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online evidence highlights assignments and a final group project, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

comments calling him hard, unclear, and disorganized, while some students find him passionate and informative.

Main concern

The biggest concern is heavy work combined with and assignment expectations.

What students said

“He gives more hw than all my other 4 classes combined”
JOUR100
“Not an easy A, have to really work for and the first amendment project can really bring down your grade”
INTROTOMEDIA
“its really not hard to get an A if you read and .”
JOUR100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but , and a damaging final group project.

Main concern

Online students may struggle because and group work can hurt grades.

What students said

“He while taking this course.”
JOUR100
“At times but and clarifies any questions you may have.”
101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some reviews describe online open-note or open-book tests, but , so .

Online TestsOpen NotesOpen BookTricky TestsUnclear Test Questions

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence mentions online open-note or open-book tests, but also tricky and .

Online TestsOpen NotesOpen BookTricky Test Questions
“Tests and and are open notes & open book.”
JOUR100
“TestQs were contradicting.”
JOUR100
“ ”
INTROTOMEDIA

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, have to really work for and the first amendment project can really bring down your .”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He is not a good teacher,his orientation is boring, there is no spark of interest for this course.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“He gives more hw than all my other 4 classes combined”

⚖️

20/100

“Ok he grades really really hard.. like seriously hard..”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a cool guy, he will teach you a lot, if you are willing to learn.
  • He wanders off in his speeches, and is not adherent to his topics
  • The and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I have only one word to describe this teacher: HARD!!!!!!!!
  • Not an easy A, have to really work for and the first amendment project can really bring down your grade
  • its really not hard to get an A if you read and .

Theme 3

🧩 About Assignments

  • The the final group project
  • expect a lot of homework.
  • There are 2 group projects that are really easy if everyone cooperates & gets things done.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 41 reviews span many years and give consistent repeated themes, though some older comments are vague or extreme.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 511
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 514

Course coverage

JOUR10018 reviews
JOURNALISM5 reviews
1012 reviews
JOURN1002 reviews
JOURNALISM1052 reviews
Show 12 more courses
INTROTOMASS1 review
INTROTOMEDIA1 review
J1001 review
JOUNALISM1 review
JOUR1011 review
JOUR1071 review
JOUR1211 review
JOURN1 review
JOURNALISM1031 review
NEWSPRODUCT1 review
NEWSPRODUCTION1 review
TALONMARKS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values