AI Rate Professor

English

Rudith Maravilla

ENGL103 · ENG23986 · ENG101 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want an engaging , and participation are rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong FeedbackDiscussion DrivenLots of WritingEngaging LecturesParticipation Matters
  • Students , and respect for student voices.
  • The course requires substantial reading, essays, research work, and participation, so procrastination is risky.
  • Grades are very attainable for students who keep up, revise carefully, and engage with class discussions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

High grades are common, but , and participation rather than coast.

Online and and writing, with in-person reviews giving more detail about how effort turns into strong grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The ideas and , but the course demands sustained writing, reading, and critical thinking.

The single online review matches the in-person pattern: engaging lectures but a and writing load.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters and in-class discussion is central, while late work is limited unless notice is given.

In-person reviews strongly support participation and deadline expectations, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students recommend him because , and helps students improve despite the workload.

Both formats are positive, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Grades are strong when students complete the work, follow MLA and assignment expectations, and , but late work and procrastination are not forgiving.

Format shift

, while the online review confirms workload but not grading rules.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention many essays, reading, commentaries, a research paper, presentations, quizzes, and required books.

Format shift

and writing, with in-person reviews giving far more detail on assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Reviews consistently call him engaging, helpful, passionate, respectful, and .

Format shift

Online evidence is positive but limited, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment is dominated by essays, commentaries, research papers, critiques, presentations, reading, and participation, with and .

Format shift

, while online reviews mention reading and writing generally.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and discussion style while noting multiple essays, reading, research, and presentations.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and deadlines.

What students said

“ and I can confidently say I learned a lot in his course.”
ENG100
“Obviously there will be a lot of essays to write, but despite the .”
ENG103
“Procrastination does not fly!”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive but clearly warns about a lot of reading and writing.

Main concern

The online evidence is limited and and writing.

What students said

“there is definitely a lot of reading and writing but they are great lectures that .”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and standard, with and final plus reading quizzes.

In-Class MidtermIn-Class FinalReading Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final and reading quizzes, but does not clearly prove proctoring or .

In-Class MidtermIn-Class FinalReading Quizzes
“in-class midterm and ”
ENG100
“4 essays, quizzes on reading, one oral presentation.”
ENG103

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and I can confidently say I learned a lot in his course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“He is a really great teacher! I loved the topics he chose for class discussions and essays.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“Obviously there will be a lot of essays to write, but despite the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“really good lectures. should have tried harder for an A. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Engaging, funny, and reasonable professor.
  • Amazing teacher! Hes very inspirational and passionate about education.
  • This professor has a refreshing style of lecturing.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing & Workload

  • there is definitely a lot of reading and writing but they are great lectures that .
  • He gives about 4-5 essays really interesting topics
  • You will have to do a research paper and presentation before the final.

Theme 3

💬

  • .
  • Everyone has a voice in this class and everyones opinion matters.
  • Make sure you read before class and participate.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The 13 reviews are detailed, recent within a narrow span, and highly consistent about teaching style, workload, and .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1005 reviews
ENG1035 reviews
ENG1011 review
ENG239861 review
ENGL1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 3 · A- 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values