AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Edward Bloomfield

PHIL52 · PHILOS · MANY · PHILOSOPHY101 · PHIL100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him for a deeply rewarding philosophy experience if you are willing to study and engage with challenging ideas.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirationalClear storytellerCaring and respectfulHard but rewardingHighly memorable
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as an exceptional, caring, and inspiring teacher.
  • The course can be hard and requires study, but students say .
  • The review set is old, so credibility is limited by age despite strong consistency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are possible, but comments stress studying, work, and a hard class rather than an effortless A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Philosophy content can be hard and abstract, but .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and unusually memorable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are not described as harsh, but students mention hard classes, studying, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention work, assignments, and studying, but the workload is framed as worthwhile rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students repeatedly call him clear, caring, inspirational, articulate, respectful, and one of .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention assignments and studying but provide little evidence of .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly enthusiastic, praising his clarity, respect, storytelling, and influence despite some difficulty.

Main concern

The main concern is that some students found the class hard and work-intensive.

What students said

“ AND THOROUGH.”
PHILOSOPHY101
“He makes abstact subjects seem simple and clear.”
MANY
“HARD CLASS, but great teacher, respect him and his students & study! u'll b fine”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, book policy, or final structure.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting teaching excellence, inspiration, and manageable difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ AND THOROUGH.”

👍 Recommendation Level

94/100

“ .”

📚 Difficulty Balance

48/100

“HARD CLASS, but great teacher, respect him and his students & study! u'll b fine”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches as though he is telling everyone in class a story.
  • He makes abstact subjects seem simple and clear.
  • Very good teacher. Loves topic.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He was loving, caring, inspirational, encouraging, uplifting, motivational; just can't say enough.
  • The most articulate, respectful, and gracious teacher you can imagine.
  • HE IS ONE OF THE .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • You'll have some work to do in this class, it's not all peachy.
  • HARD CLASS, but great teacher, respect him and his students & study! u'll b fine
  • not too involved with the students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews are consistent and detailed about teaching quality, but most are very old and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1003 reviews
PHILOSOPHY1013 reviews
MANY1 review
PHIL521 review
PHILOS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values