AI Rate Professor

Speech

Ashley Graham

COMM130 · SPEECH145 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can tolerate an inconsistent teaching experience and are comfortable preparing independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing ReviewsEasy SpeechesLecture HeavyPowerPoint ReadingMixed Professionalism
  • Student experiences are sharply split between a great class and a strongly negative teaching experience.
  • One review says the workload was light, with , and easy speeches.
  • The , and rude behavior.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

The speeches and workload can be easy, but reported grades were B and B+, so an A is not clearly low-effort.

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The speech work sounds easy, but the teaching inconsistency makes the course less straightforward for some students.

, and they conflict by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters and students need to be prepared to speak, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation is split because one student loved the class while another strongly warned students away.

The mixed recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades were decent and assignments sounded manageable, but there is .

Format shift

and assignments.

Workload

Light

78/100

One review reports only one paper, a , and easy speeches.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching feedback is highly polarized, ranging from great professor to PowerPoint reading and rude behavior.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and varies strongly by course.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews conflict strongly, with one student praising the easy, enjoyable class and another warning against taking her.

Main concern

Teaching quality and professionalism appear inconsistent across courses.

What students said

“really good professor, only had 1 paper due, midterm and a final.”
SPEECH145
“she literally and that is all.”
COMM130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final but do not clearly prove exam format, difficulty, or proctoring policy.

MidtermFinal

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final but does not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

MidtermFinal
“only had 1 paper due, midterm and a final.”
SPEECH145

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . not a good professor. she literally and that is all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“she literally and that is all.”

📚 Workload

78/100

“only had 1 paper due, midterm and a final.”

👍 Recommendation Level

48/100

“Overall great professor and really enjoyed the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really good professor, only had 1 paper due, midterm and a final.
  • she literally and that is all.
  • I feel like she doesn't know how to teach yet.

Theme 2

📈

  • The speeches we had to give were very easy, make sure you are prepared to speak.
  • only had 1 paper due, midterm and a final.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • Overall great professor and really enjoyed the .
  • talk about RUDE.
  • if I were you. :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews exist, and they sharply conflict, limiting confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMM1301 review
SPEECH1451 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values