AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Wayne Cottrell

ENGR235 · ENG110 · ENGR110 · ENGR235STATICS · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from notes, books, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoided By StudentsLecture HeavyTough GraderUnclear ExamsSelf Teaching Required
  • Most students strongly warn against taking him because .
  • Several reviews say exams include material not covered in .
  • A small minority says students can , and doing the homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A good grade is possible for some students, but , and surviving difficult exams.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Some students say the material is simple or straightforward, but poor teaching and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course content and delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , though lecture notes appear important for passing.

In-person reviews imply attendance helps, but no online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and poor support.

All and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple reviews call him a and , and unfair exams.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews mention lots of , and self-teaching.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most reviews describe boring lectures, unclear explanations, wrong or stuck problem solving, and poor responsiveness.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Several reviews emphasize midterms, finals, tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say exams are unfair and lectures do not prepare them well.

What students said

“ .”
ENGR235STATICS
“ .”
ENGR235
“For the love of . Ever.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students repeatedly say tests are very hard and include material not covered in class or homework.

Hard ExamsMidterm And FinalUncovered Exam MaterialTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final exams with questions not clearly covered beforehand.

Hard ExamsMidterm And FinalUncovered Exam MaterialTest Heavy
“ cover.”
ENGR235STATICS
“midterm and final, and both contain questions that never appeared in the homework.”
ENGR110
“The tests contained problems that were never reviewed or assigned as .”
ENGR235

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid if possible. A good amount of the time during lecture he is stuck and does not know how to solve problems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“A good amount of the time during lecture he is stuck and does not know how to solve problems.”

⚖️

18/100

“ , so many students did not know where they stood grade-wise.”

📝

18/100

“The tests contained problems that were never reviewed or assigned as .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Long, boring lectures.
  • Never really responses to questions.
  • Gets stuck on some concepts, gets others wrong.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams And Grading

  • cover.
  • midterm and final, and both contain questions that never appeared in the homework.
  • Remembered the highest student had a C in the class.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendations

  • .
  • .
  • For the love of . Ever.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across multiple terms show a consistent pattern of negative concerns, with several detailed examples.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1103 reviews
ENGR1102 reviews
ENGR2351 review
ENGR235STATICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1