AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

Jayanada Hiranandani

ENGT160 · ENGT265 · ENGT131 · AAAA · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you value an easy, structured class more than engaging lectures.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy open-book testsBoring lecturesBeginner friendly when engagedPoor presentationSteady assignments
  • The course content and and guided handouts.
  • Many students criticize his presentation as .
  • Positive students say beginners can learn if they keep up with assignments and ask for help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A seems reachable because students report easy work, guided assignments, and open-book tests, but you must keep up weekly.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material is often described as easy and beginner friendly, though poor delivery can make learning harder.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but students warn that leaving early or falling behind causes problems.

online evidence available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is mixed because the class can be easy and useful, but many students strongly dislike his presentation.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Open-book tests, easy work, and reported A if .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Work is usually easy but steady, with handouts and and completed each week.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

He knows some material and helps beginners, but many students call the , and poorly presented.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention both handout assignments and open-book tests, so assessment .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and open-book tests but frequent frustration with boring or .

Main concern

Lectures can be dull, hard to understand, and poorly presented.

What students said

“Very easy intro into AutoCAD.”
ENGT131
“ ...Unless you sit infront of class you would "hear" him speak but not understand a word.”
ENGT131

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

exam style student-friendly despite weak teaching reviews.

Open Book Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as open book, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, midterm format, or .

Open Book Tests
“ ?”
ENGT131
“the !”
ENGT131

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very easy intro into AutoCAD. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Knows the material but presentation is the worst.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

78/100

“Class was cake.”

📘

85/100

“ ?”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hardest thing about his class was staying awake.
  • Poor presentation and personal hygiene.
  • He is a bit hard to understand because of his accent and how low he speaks but he knows his stuff.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The work is very easy and you get a lot of practice...
  • Very easy intro into AutoCAD.
  • Class was cake.

Theme 3

🗂️ About Assignments

  • Every day, there's something to do.
  • Keep up with .
  • Make sure you get all the handouts and turn them in before the end of the semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen in-person reviews over many years give and weak presentation.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGT13111 reviews
ENGT2654 reviews
AAAA1 review
ENGT1601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values