AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Pam Rogers

CD110 · CD139 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you are willing to participate and keep up with steady project and paper work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate TeacherKind and AccessibleLots of WorkParticipation MattersSomewhat Unorganized
  • Students generally like Rogers and describe her as kind, passionate, and helpful.
  • The class is easy to pass, but the workload is heavier than the difficulty rating suggests.
  • Organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class is easy to pass and several students earned A grades, but the A still requires completing substantial work.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content appears approachable and project-based, though the amount of work prevents it from being effortless.

Only in-person reviews describe course ease.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation and because reviews warn that skipping class can hurt passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and passion, but some hesitate because of disorganization and workload.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades are attainable, but comments mention and a need to complete all work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload is heavy for the difficulty level, with students , and quite a bit of work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students describe her as , and fun, though organization is inconsistent.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessments appear assignment-heavy because , and no tests in one course.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe Rogers as kind and passionate, but the class requires participation and steady work.

Main concern

Students mention , and .

What students said

“She is very passionate about child development”
CD139
“there is a lot of work assigned”
CD139
“ ”
CD139

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one review says there were no tests, but reviews do not clearly prove the policy across all courses.

No Tests in CD110Group ProjectsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format Across All Courses

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence says CD110 used no tests and group projects, but other courses .

No Tests in CD110Group Projects
“ fun.”
CD110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her class is easy to pass although there is a lot of work assigned( just do all the work! duh) .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Rogers is a great teacher.”

📚 Workload

35/100

“Gives out quite a bit of work, but it is all important.”

⚖️

55/100

“she is unorganized in the structure of her class and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very passionate about child development
  • She really tries to work with you.
  • She is a really nice teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Participation

  • Do the .
  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • Gives out quite a bit of work

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • , and is indecisive.
  • she is unorganized in the structure of her class and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews are fairly consistent, but the sample is small and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1393 reviews
CD1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values