AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ana Torres-Bower

PHIL101 · PHIL2345 · PHIL106 · PHIL103 · PHIL202 · PHILO100 · PHILL101 · PHIL102 · PHILO104 · PHIL104 · PHILOSOPHY · PHILOSOPHY100 · PHIL100 · LOGIC · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you are willing to read, write, and ask for help, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate TeacherHeavy WritingHelpful If AskedConfusing DirectionsLenient Revisions
  • Students often praise her passion, kindness, and willingness to help.
  • The , and inconsistent organization.
  • Grades can be fair or lenient if students read, write, revise, and seek help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with effort because she offers help, revisions, and sometimes , but the reading and writing load is real.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The philosophy content is manageable for engaged students, but and heavy writing make it moderately challenging.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

, but reviews do not prove a strict mandatory policy.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

because she is passionate, helpful, and often lenient, despite organization issues.

All recommendations come from in-person reviews, which are strongly mixed but lean positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Reviews mention , late work, retakes, and revisions, though a few students call her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many reviews describe lots of , and major writing projects.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She is often described as passionate, caring, and helpful, but her clarity and organization are inconsistent.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The course , and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and passionate professor whose writing-heavy classes reward effort but .

Main concern

and heavy writing are the biggest risks.

What students said

“She offers a lot of so its hard to fail.”
PHIL104
“There is a lot to read and write so get ready because it's an .”
PHIL103
“This Prof. .”
PHIL104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but generally student-friendly, with , and homework-based questions mentioned.

Take-Home TestsRetakes AllowedHomework-Based TestsIn-Class Essays

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and in-class essays, but no clear proctoring policy.

Take-Home TestsRetakes AllowedHomework-Based TestsIn-Class Essays
“ , but they are not easy.”
PHIL100
“MAJORITY OF AND BOOK(WHICH THINGS WE HAVE ALREADY DONE).”
PHIL106
“ .”
PHIL202

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor, but expects her students to be dedicated.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She is enthusiastic,and is always willing to give further information and clarity of the concepts studied.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“There is a lot to read and write so get ready because it's an .”

⚖️

72/100

“Sometimes she will .”

👍 Recommendation Level

74/100

“Great professor, but expects her students to be dedicated.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shows great interest in students and the material.
  • This Prof. .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She offers a lot of so its hard to fail.
  • She's also a .
  • Just try and you'll pass.

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Load

  • There is a lot to read and write so get ready because it's an .
  • This class is so hard, the mid-term was 10 pages and the length or longer.
  • she assigns alot of writing...like a paper each class meeting.

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • and energetic.
  • Dr. Torres-Bower is the most pro-student professor ive ever met!
  • She is a !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews across many years give rich and consistent evidence about teaching style, workload, and .

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 513
3 out of 57
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL1009 reviews
PHIL1067 reviews
PHIL1045 reviews
PHIL1023 reviews
PHIL1033 reviews
Show 9 more courses
PHIL1012 reviews
PHIL2022 reviews
PHILO1042 reviews
PHILOSOPHY2 reviews
LOGIC1 review
PHIL23451 review
PHILL1011 review
PHILO1001 review
PHILOSOPHY1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1