AI Rate Professor

Microbiology

shereese Alexander

MICRO200 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding microbiology class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict gradingHigh effortClear expectationsExam wording issues
  • Students agree the course requires serious studying and careful test wording.
  • , and strong learning support.
  • Negative , and disputed exam marking.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students , and exact wording expectations on exams.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The microbiology content is detail-heavy and students say they must study hard to keep up.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy, but .

Only in-person comments mention class and lab behavior; there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is mixed but leans negative because and exam wording concerns outweigh one very positive review.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students , and answers marked wrong for wording rather than concept understanding.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is not described as assignment-heavy, but students say the class demands serious studying and detailed preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

One student praises her clarity and professionalism, while and .

Format shift

, and they conflict strongly on teaching quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments emphasize exams, lab performance, study guides, multiple choice, and short answer questions more than assignments.

Format shift

The assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding but and high study expectations.

Main concern

Students may lose points for .

What students said

“You have to study really hard.”
MICRO200
“She will fail you if you still have a pencil in your hand.”
MICRO200
“ and gives great advice on how to achieve what is expected.”
MICRO200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear strict because students report short answer questions and .

Study Guide Before ExamsMultiple ChoiceShort Answer QuestionsExact Wording Expected

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, short answer questions, and strict answer wording.

Study Guide Before ExamsMultiple ChoiceShort Answer QuestionsExact Wording Expected
“Gives a .”
MICRO200
“ but mostly short answer questions.”
MICRO200
“she only wants specific words”
MICRO200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You have to study really hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ and gives great advice on how to achieve what is expected.”

⚖️

20/100

“be because she marks things wrong that aren't wrong.”

📚 Course Effort

30/100

“You have to study really hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very professional.
  • In .
  • She makes sure everyone learns all the details so everyone fully understands.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to study really hard.
  • She will fail you if you still have a pencil in your hand.
  • Expect to answer the words she uses it does not matter if u understand the concept because she only wants specific words .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they contain specific and fairly consistent concerns about difficulty and grading.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MICRO2003 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values