AI Rate Professor

Microbiology

Gilbert Morales

MICRO200 · BIO200 · MICR200 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and want useful lab support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast lecturesSelf-study requiredHard examsStrong lab supportPicky grading
  • Students repeatedly say lectures are short, fast, and .
  • , and steady preparation.
  • , but grading and exams can be tough.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Students say you can do fine if you study, but , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Microbiology is repeatedly described as difficult, fast-paced, and heavy on material.

Only in-person reviews exist, so all course challenge evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because one tag says skipping class hurts success and .

; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

He is worth considering for self-directed students, but not for .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students describe tough project grading, picky expectations, and and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of , and textbook use.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is helpful and strong in lab, but lecture is often described as fast, short, and mostly PowerPoint reading.

Format shift

better than lecture teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and handout-based study.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a fast, handout-driven microbiology class where motivated .

Main concern

Students who need detailed lecture explanations may struggle with fast PowerPoint-based teaching.

What students said

“This proffesor gives a short so you will need to study on your own.”
MICRO200
“ . Study HARD.”
MICRO200
“Great in the laboratory, really knows his stuff!”
MICRO200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because , and multiple quizzes, while no student-friendly exam policy is clearly proven.

Hard ExamsTwo ExamsSix QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Hard ExamsTwo ExamsSix QuizzesTest Heavy
“Your grade is basically based on 2 exams 6 quizzes.”
MICRO200
“ .”
MICRO200
“ .”
MICRO200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This proffesor gives a short so you will need to study on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Very cool teacher. Doesn't teach much in , but gives you a copy of the presentation so you have notes to work off of.”

📚 Course Difficulty

30/100

“This is a very hard class so you have to be very motivated, but he tries to help out quite a bit.”

🧪 Lab Experience

65/100

“Great in the laboratory, really knows his stuff!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures very quickly its no joke.
  • He basically reads through the hand out while maximixing it with .
  • Doesn't teach much in

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!!!!
  • . Study HARD.
  • he is picky in grading. .

Theme 3

🧪

  • done in a little amount of time
  • . LOTS of material covered.
  • Great in the laboratory, really knows his stuff!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews provide repeated specific themes, but many are old and grade outcome data is missing.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MICRO2007 reviews
BIO2001 review
MICR2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values