AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Jennifer Paris

CDEC112 · CD139 · CDEC111 · CDEC161 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless and are willing to ask for clarification often.

Best fit · Effort For RewardConfusing instructionsTough gradingProject heavyLecture heavyPassionate but unclear
  • Most students complain that instructions and .
  • The workload appears project-heavy, and .
  • One positive review says caring about the work leads to strong results, but the overall tone is hesitant.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades can be good when students care about the work, but confusing instructions and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject is not described as extremely hard, but and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but lecture and activity structure suggest attending helps manage confusing expectations.

and only from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

because the class feels confusing, boring, and .

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students mention and , though one review says careful work can earn strong results.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students report , and repeated table activities that make the class feel demanding.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

46/100

Her passion is noted, but most , and boring lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize homework and structure described.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly , and frustrating lectures, with one student noting that effort can pay off.

Main concern

Students may and .

What students said

“ and there are many projects”
CD139
“ ”
CDEC112
“As long as you care about the work you turn in, you'll pass with flying colors.”
161

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and there are many projects”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“ ”

📌 Assignment Clarity

35/100

“She gives lots of ”

⚖️

32/100

“she ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and aggressive
  • and she even confuses herself at times
  • Anything you .

Theme 2

📚

  • and there are many projects
  • She uses a PowerPoint lecture each day and pauses every few minutes to do a table activity.
  • As long as you care about the work you turn in, you'll pass with flying colors.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she
  • nobody really knew what she was looking for
  • It was an okay class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide a consistent complaint pattern, but the sample is small and somewhat old.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CDEC1612 reviews
1611 review
CD1391 review
CDEC1111 review
CDEC1121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values