AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Ceci Medina

CDEC112 · CHDEV112 · CHILDDEV112 · CD110 · CDEC113 · CDEC111 · CDC111 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and manage the work independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear GradingConfusing LecturesUnorganizedEasy WorkPoor Communication
  • Most negative , and poor communication.
  • Some students found the work and and .
  • All evidence is from in-person classes, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Passing can be easy if you complete the work, but and directions make an A feel unreliable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The content and as easy, but make the class harder than the material itself.

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because students mention class activities, case studies, and being called out during lectures.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and frustrating grading.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with no online reviews to compare.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Several students report unfair or the work well.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Workload is often described as easy or light, with some class projects and homework but little evidence of heavy outside work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and weak on clear explanations.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and case studies, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative because students , and weak communication.

Main concern

Students may struggle with and .

What students said

“ and the communication with her students.”
CDEC113
“ and unprepared!! .”
CD110
“the , unless you dont study then obviously.”
CHILDDEV112

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but students mention , and one comment about group tests.

Tests Require StudyingGroup Tests MentionedNo Clear Study Guide

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if students study, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Tests Require StudyingGroup Tests MentionedNo Clear Study Guide
“the , unless you dont study then obviously.”
CHILDDEV112
“The only good thing is that she believes in group test”
CDEC112
“For the .”
CDEC112

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very unorganized and unprepared!! . talks about random things. !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Such a confusing teacher.”

⚖️

25/100

“ and the communication with her students.”

📚 Workload

72/100

“hwk is so but study, the textbook is required!!! :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher just talks for the sake of talking.
  • non stop talker could talk for hours
  • VERY GOOD AMD DEDICATED TEACHER. LOVE HER CLASS.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • If you do all your hw you will pass
  • the work is SO easy.
  • she does not give hw.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • and unprepared!! .
  • respond.
  • I received and she gave me an unfair grade at the end.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 12 in-person reviews span many years and show repeated themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD1102 reviews
CDC1112 reviews
CDEC1112 reviews
CDEC1122 reviews
CDEC1132 reviews
Show 2 more courses
CHDEV1121 review
CHILDDEV1121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1