AI Rate Professor

English

Susanna Clemens

ENGL102 · ENGL103 · ENG100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and are willing to write a lot.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulCaringLenient RevisionsWriting HeavyExtra Credit
  • Students describe her as kind, helpful, and caring.
  • The , and a final 10-page paper.
  • and somewhat lenient, especially through revisions and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic with writing effort because she allows revisions and offers , but the workload is not effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person English classes, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content is manageable but writing-heavy, with , and a 10-page paper.

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation but do .

The policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students recommend her because , and pushes students to improve without being harsh.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

She uses holistic grading, allows revisions, and offers , though the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The class has many essays, responses, and a 10-page paper, but reviewers frame it as normal for English.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload, and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students describe her as nice, helpful, respectful, caring, and willing to push students to improve.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is all in-person and mostly strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, writing responses, revisions, participation, and a .

Format shift

evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and helpful teacher whose classes require substantial writing but reward effort.

Main concern

The main concern is the amount of writing and the .

What students said

“Lenient and do so well on essays (AKA allows revisions).”
ENGL102
“There is a lot of but, hey, its an english class.”
ENG100
“she is a bit hard but only to push you to do more than you would.”
ENGL103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a lot of but, hey, its an english class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, and writing workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“great professor nice and helpful”

⚖️

78/100

“Lenient and do so well on essays (AKA allows revisions).”

📝 Workload

48/100

“There is a lot of but, hey, its an english class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great professor nice and helpful
  • Mrs. Clemens is a very nice teacher and cares about her student.
  • She is very respectful and kind to all students and loves participation.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is a bit hard but only to push you to do more than you would.
  • Lenient and do so well on essays (AKA allows revisions).
  • She makes an effort to learn all her students names and offers tons of .

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Load

  • There is a lot of but, hey, its an english class.
  • She also has a !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the four reviews are consistent and specific, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1032 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENGL1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values