AI Rate Professor

English

Joana Gonzales

ENGLI100 · ENG20 · ENG52 · ENG101 · ENG100 · ENGL52 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Take her only if you want a demanding English class and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard GraderHeavy Writing WorkloadDemanding StandardsClear But ImpatientBlunt Feedback
  • Students repeatedly describe her as a tough and .
  • Several students say they learned a lot, but the course requires sustained effort and resilience.
  • The strongest complaints focus on impatience, rudeness, favoritism, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

26/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students , and the need to master every assignment.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The English content is manageable for some students, but the high writing standards and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory for keeping up, and missing work strongly affects grades.

, and no online attendance evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendations are split, but many students warn against taking her because of , and unfair treatment.

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students frequently call her a hard, picky, or and say A grades are rare.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students mention , and lots of writing that must be completed carefully.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

and enthusiasm, but repeated complaints about impatience and rude treatment reduce the overall teaching score.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and Turnitin rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

lectures but harsh grading, heavy writing work, and inconsistent student treatment.

Main concern

and blunt treatment make the class risky for students seeking grade security.

What students said

“The workload was heavy, and the way certain students were treated left a bad impression.”
ENG100
“If you want an A in her class you need to work and .”
ENG20
“ and .”
ENGLI100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam style.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring rules, open-book status, or final exam style.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an A in her class you need to work and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student treatment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“ and .”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Assigns a lot of work. because it will affect your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good teacher but no patience.
  • Love her enthusiasm, it kept me awake in the morning
  • I honestly learned more from her than any other teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She seldom gives A's.
  • , but a good teacher.This teacher will make you work hard for your grade.
  • she is easy to give grade c.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • There is no way ANYONE will ever get an A in this teacher's class.
  • The workload was heavy, and the way certain students were treated left a bad impression.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 19 reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern of , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1009 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
ENG203 reviews
ENGLI1002 reviews
ENG521 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL521 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values