AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Richard Vasilik

AUTO110 · AUTO111 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Richard Vasilik if you can learn independently and engage actively, but expect a highly inconsistent experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHighly KnowledgeableInconsistent TeachingField ExperienceSelective AttentionMixed Student Experience
  • Reviews are sharply split between an incredible teacher and a poor, self-focused classroom experience.
  • One student earned an A with basic effort, while another felt excluded and poorly taught.
  • , but teaching consistency is the main risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One student earned an A by doing the work and participating, but the mixed teaching experience makes the path uncertain.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The subject appears manageable for engaged students but difficult when instruction becomes unfocused or selective.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

One positive review specifically says to be on time, but .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether his teaching style works for the student.

, and those reviews strongly conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One A is reported with effort, but the reviews .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The positive review emphasizes doing work and participating, while .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Students agree he has knowledge, but they sharply disagree on whether he teaches effectively and fairly.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

while criticizing selective and unfocused teaching.

Main concern

Students may not receive equal attention or consistently practical instruction.

What students said

“Mr. Vasilik is an amazing instructor.”
AUTO111
“He cherry picked the class on who he wanted to teach things to and the rest was left out in the cold.”
AUTO110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, or final requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has tons of experience in the field and will answer and questions you have thoroughly to make sure you understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting polarized views on teaching, knowledge, and fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Mr. Vasilik is an amazing instructor.”

⚖️ Consistency Risk

50/100

“He cherry picked the class on who he wanted to teach things to and the rest was left out in the cold.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

50/100

“Will be taking as many classes with him as I can!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Vasilik is an amazing instructor.
  • He manipulated the class to suit himself!

Theme 2

🧠 About Knowledge

  • He has tons of experience in the field and will answer and questions you have thoroughly to make sure you understand.
  • this instructor has a lot of very useful knowledge

Theme 3

📈 About Effort & Grades

  • Do your work, pay attention, participate, and be on time.
  • the rest was left out in the cold.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Two detailed but , though their opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTO1101 review
AUTO1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1