AI Rate Professor

Geography

Ashley Misje

GEO105 · GEOG105 · GEOG103 · GEO2025 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you can tolerate and rely on notes, study guides, and clarification requests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful When AskedConfusing LecturesLong LecturesStudy GuidesLight Grading
  • Students generally like Misje, but several say lectures can be long, messy, or confusing.
  • The course seems low difficulty, with study guides, notes, and .
  • There is one strongly negative review, so the experience depends on .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class appears easy if students use notes, study guides, and assignments, but less effortless.

All Easy A evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but and messy lectures keep the content from feeling truly effortless.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

because she is helpful and provides useful notes, but confusion is a real drawback.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

because one review says and difficulty ratings are low.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Workload includes tests, projects, videos, reaction papers, group activities, and , but students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students find Misje helpful and interesting, but repeated comments about lower the teaching score.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears balanced across tests, projects, reaction papers, group activities, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show an easy but , and willing to clarify.

Main concern

The main concern is lecture clarity, with .

What students said

“Lectures were long but .”
GEOG105
“Just .”
GEO105
“Lectures can get somewhat messy and ”
GEOG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and study guides, but do not clearly .

Study GuideTwo TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention tests and a study guide, but .

Study GuideTwo Tests
“Thanks to the study guide that helped me study.”
GEOG103
“We had 2 tests”
GEOG103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lectures can get somewhat messy and , but upon request she clarifies for a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Lectures were long but .”

⚠️ Lecture Clarity

50/100

“Lecture is somewhat long and confusing.”

📈

76/100

“I like the fact that she doesn't grade too hard on the papers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were long but .
  • Very interesting teacher, it was almost like being taught by someone my age.
  • Overall a good professor.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Clarity

  • Just .
  • Lecture is somewhat long and confusing.
  • Lectures can get somewhat messy and

Theme 3

📝 About Assessments And Support

  • Gives lots of notes.
  • Thanks to the study guide that helped me study.
  • Came in on Saturday to have a study session a couple of times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

69/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews provide useful but mixed evidence, with consistent notes about low difficulty and inconsistent lecture clarity.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

GEOG1032 reviews
GEOG1052 reviews
GEO1051 review
GEO20251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values