AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Asiya Daud

POL210 · POLISCI210 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor lecturerBoring classSelf-focused lecturesTest mismatchRequires self-study
  • Students consistently say lectures are boring and .
  • and studying independently.
  • One review suggests online post-tests once made tests easy, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students say and lectures do not prepare them well.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The material may be manageable, but and mismatched exams make the course feel challenging.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

because they describe poor teaching, boring lectures, and .

All recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Reviews say tests require studying and understanding the material, with .

Format shift

and test difficulty.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described as huge, but and studying outside lecture to pass.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students repeatedly say she is knowledgeable but well or teach the actual material.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments focus mostly on tests, post-tests, and needing to study for exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints about poor lectures, boring classes, and .

Main concern

Students say lectures do not prepare them for exams.

What students said

“If ur looking for a good teacher, keep looking.”
POL210
“She rarely lectures on the actual material.”
POL210
“You have to study and understand the material in order to pass the test.”
POLISCI210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one older review says post-tests made exams easy while a and require real study.

Online TestsChanged Test StylePost-Test Practice

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and changing test questions, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Online TestsChanged Test StylePost-Test Practice
“I and questions are completely different.”
POLISCI210
“ and if you do post tests before taking the actual test you will get 100%.”
POLISCI210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very knowledgeable but doesnt know how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She is very knowledgeable but doesnt know how to teach.”

⚠️

28/100

“ talk about anything during class.”

👎 Recommendation Level

10/100

“If ur looking for a good teacher, keep looking.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rarely lectures on the actual material.
  • Her class are very boring and basically learned nothing.
  • She never gave a good lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Tests And Grades

  • You have to study and understand the material in order to pass the test.
  • I and questions are completely different.
  • and if you do post tests before taking the actual test you will get 100%.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is moderate because four reviews are consistent but old and limited to one course area.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

POL2102 reviews
POLISCI2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values