AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Dawn Hoerner

NRSGN222 · N222PEDS · N222 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a demanding but .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExceptional supportFirm but fairHigh-energy teachingStrong clinical learningWork required
  • Students describe her as highly supportive, encouraging, and professional.
  • She pushes students to work, but the effort is framed as fair and valuable.
  • Reviews strongly praise her teaching tools, NCLEX prep, and dedication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Students praise her fairness and support, but explicitly say she makes you work for success.

All evidence comes from in-person nursing reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The rotation is not described as easy, but her tools and support make the challenge manageable.

Only in-person reviews discuss the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and deeply invested in their learning.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Students call her firm but fair, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload appears demanding because students say she makes them work, though the work is meaningful.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe her as energetic, supportive, professional, and deeply committed to learning.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention learning tools, NCLEX questions, and exams but do not give a .

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but excellent rotation led by a supportive and fair instructor.

Main concern

She makes students work hard for the learning outcomes.

What students said

“TEACHES FROM THE HEART.”
N222PEDS
“firm but extremely fair”
N222
“makes you work for it”
N222PEDS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention NCLEX review questions that often appear on exams, but .

NCLEX Review QuestionsExam Preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention NCLEX-style preparation and , but .

NCLEX Review QuestionsExam Preparation
“NCLEX review Q's that ”
N222PEDS

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TEACHES FROM THE HEART.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and challenge. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“TEACHES FROM THE HEART.”

❤️ Student Support

96/100

“She wants her students to succeed.”

⚖️ Fair Challenge

60/100

“Firm but fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A wonderful person with so much energy!
  • TEACHES FROM THE HEART.
  • Great instructor.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • , and professional at all times.
  • but extremely fair.
  • She wants her students to succeed.

Theme 3

📚 About Learning Value

  • Provides you with exceptional learning tools & NCLEX review Q's that .
  • I learned a lot.
  • Works to help her student's to become the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three older but highly consistent in-person reviews provide strong sentiment with limited sample size.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

N2221 review
N222PEDS1 review
NRSGN2221 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1