AI Rate Professor

Social Work

Chad Costello

PSY151 · INST151 · SP272PSR · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and can handle fair but serious course expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and caringFair but in-depth testsTough but worthwhileLots of handoutsMixed lecture style
  • Most reviews praise him as , and invested in student growth.
  • The class can be tough but is often described as fair and worthwhile.
  • One negative review warns that lectures can drag and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades seem achievable with effort because tests are fair, but the class can be tough and assignment-heavy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material is not effortless because students describe tough classes and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show a fair but sometimes tough class.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One review says he does full class, while no .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

because , and fair despite a tougher workload.

All and is mostly positive with one notable negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Tests are described as in-depth but fair, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

The workload appears moderate to heavy because reviews mention tough classes, handouts, outside assignments, and in-depth tests.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students describe him as , and caring, though one review criticizes his lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention in-depth tests along with handouts and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing helpfulness, mental health commitment, and fair depth, with one strong complaint about lecture style.

Main concern

The main risk is that tests and if his lecture style does not work for you.

What students said

“ and helpful.”
SP272PSR
“The class is tough, but .”
INST151
“His lectures drag and he seems like a preacher instead of a professor.”
PSY151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The but fair, with no proven open-book or strict proctoring policy.

In-Depth TestsFair TestsNo Clearly Proven Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support in-depth but , while .

In-Depth TestsFair Tests
“ , but fair.”
SP272PSR

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is tough, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching support, fair difficulty, and workload concerns; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Chad was great! and helpful.”

⚖️

62/100

“ , but fair.”

📚 Workload Reality

46/100

“He gives a lot of handouts and outside assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chad was great! and helpful.
  • The professor is there whenever you need any help.
  • .
  • His lectures drag and he seems like a preacher instead of a professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but fair.
  • The class is tough, but .
  • He gives a lot of handouts and outside assignments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

36/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 4 old reviews, though .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

INST1512 reviews
PSY1511 review
SP272PSR1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2