AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Jacylen Troupe

SOC110 · SOCIO101 · SOC201 · SOC101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the textbook and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff Topic LecturesSelf-Teach RequiredHard To FollowTake-Home TestsStrong Avoid Signal
  • Most students say lectures go off topic and do not teach the course material clearly.
  • Several reviews say students must rely on the textbook to survive the class.
  • Assignments, quizzes, and as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A few students found parts easy, but , and self-teaching risk.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The sociology content may not be inherently hard, but and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not establish a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking her because lectures are off topic and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students describe failing risk, a , and quizzes unrelated to lessons.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload feels heavy because , and difficult tests require extra self-teaching.

Format shift

The workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews say she gets sidetracked, does not teach the material, and leaves students confused.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and textbook-based preparation rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly , and a need to self-teach from the book.

Main concern

Students report that lectures often do not .

What students said

“Must teach yourself from the book.”
SOCIO101
“Class was a waste of time, , and expect you to know everything pertaining to the class.”
SOC201
“ and so hard to understand.”
SOC201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but the and format are inconsistently described and not clearly proven.

Take-Home TestsConfusing QuizzesUnclear Test Coverage

Assessment risk

Varies

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes that students found unclear or disconnected from lessons.

Take-Home TestsConfusing QuizzesUnclear Test Coverage
“ and so hard to understand.”
SOC201
“ she actually does teach.”
SOCIO101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Must teach yourself from the book.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“HORRIBLE TEACHER. because she didn't teach AT ALL.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ !”

⚖️ Assessment Clarity

35/100

“ she actually does teach.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All she talks about is personal stuff and gets off topic all the time.
  • Gets side tracked way too much.
  • Class was a waste of time, , and expect you to know everything pertaining to the class.

Theme 2

📚

  • READ THE TEXTBOOK!
  • Must teach yourself from the book.
  • you will NEED the book 4 this class.

Theme 3

🧪

  • and so hard to understand.
  • and majority of the time does not explain the .
  • she actually does teach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

and strongly consistent, though the sample is small and clustered in time.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

SOC1013 reviews
SOC2012 reviews
SOC1101 review
SOCIO1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1