AI Rate Professor

English

. Asiddao

ENGLI100 · ENGLISH52 · ENGL102 · ENGL52 · ENG52 · HIST100 · ENGL100 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100101 · ENG102 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · ENG232 · ENG · ENG100 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a demanding English class and , and inconsistent student experiences.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingUnclear expectationsLecture heavyPolarizing
  • Student opinion is sharply split, with some praising his literature analysis and .
  • The course often , and strong participation.
  • Many negative reviews cite unclear expectations, harsh grading, poor help, or a difficult personality.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and high expectations despite a few claims of easy grading.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is challenging because students describe difficult , and long demanding classes.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but participation and class discussion seem important to succeeding.

Attendance flexibility and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recommendation is low because many students warn against , and poor support.

The .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call him a tough or , although a few reviews say he grades easily.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Workload is heavy because reviews mention lots of reading, weekly essays, hard topics, a research paper, and a .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

46/100

He has some strong reviews for analysis and discussion, but many students describe him as .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is in-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize essays, research papers, reading, group work, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a polarizing professor who can teach serious literary analysis but is often described as , and frustrating.

Main concern

Students frequently report , and limited support.

What students said

“If you don't like .”
ENG100
“he makes you read hard , and grades hard.”
ENG100
“He is a , but his lectures are excellent.”
ENG232

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mixed, with comments mentioning a and final report but not clearly proving standard exam rules or proctoring.

Take-Home FinalFinal ReportEssay-Based WorkReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final exam or report, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Take-Home FinalFinal ReportEssay-Based Work
“He gives an and a .”
ENG100101
“He assigned a forgien novel as our the topic for our final report, which was to be 10+ pages long, and the .”
ENGLISH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't like . He is a very good teacher and you will learn, but be prepared to write and participate in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“He is a , but his lectures are excellent.”

📚 Workload And Difficulty

24/100

“BE PREPAIRD TO READ!!! AND WRITE A LOT OF ESSAYS!!”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

32/100

“Stay away!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is definitely a brillant man, but admittedly it takes a certain level of comprehension to really benefit from his course
  • . and his way of teaching sucks.
  • He is an execellent teacher when it comes to making one analyze literature.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • he makes you read hard , and grades hard.
  • Fair, but a strict one. Lets you know from the beginning that it will not be easy in his class.
  • but .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • HE IS VERY VERY HARD.IF YOU LOVE TO LEARN IN A CLASS AND NOT COAST THROUGH IT. .IF NOT. .
  • If your the type of student that likes plenty of feedback and student-teacher communication Asiddao is not for you.
  • I .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 42 in-person reviews across many years provide detailed and recurring patterns, even though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 511
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG10015 reviews
ENGLISH1006 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
ENGL1003 reviews
ENG522 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENGLISH2 reviews
ENGLISH522 reviews
1021 review
ENG1 review
ENG1001011 review
ENG1021 review
ENG2321 review
ENGL1021 review
ENGL521 review
ENGLI1001 review
HIST1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1