AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Cesar Jacobo

AUTO100 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Consider him only if you prioritize automotive expertise, because the review record is too thin and includes a serious conduct concern.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnows his fieldProject guidanceSerious conduct concernVery easy coursePolarized reviews
  • The limited evidence is sharply split between strong technical praise and a serious negative classroom conduct complaint.
  • The course appears easy based on low difficulty and one A+ report, but the sample is too small for confidence.
  • Recommendation is weak because the newest review is strongly negative despite an older positive review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The class appears low difficulty and one reviewer earned an A+, but the evidence is too limited to call it effortless.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Both difficulty ratings are low, suggesting the course content is manageable for students in the program.

Only in-person evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The newest review strongly warns students away, outweighing the older positive comment in a very small sample.

and highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

One reported A+ and very low difficulty suggest lenient outcomes, but the evidence base is small.

Format shift

and difficulty evidence.

Workload

Light

78/100

Low difficulty ratings suggest a light workload, though comments do not describe assignments in detail.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Technical knowledge and project guidance are praised, but the recent conduct complaint sharply lowers the teaching experience score.

Format shift

review and one negative recent review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The positive review mentions project guidance, while .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention course activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

automotive expertise and one warning students away over classroom conduct.

Main concern

A recent review reports a serious personal conduct issue.

What students said

“One of the .”
AUTO100
“Do not i repeat do not take classes with Cesar Jacobo in the Automotive Department.”
AUTO100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting the split between expertise and a serious conduct complaint. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“knows his stuff and is willing to .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

35/100

“stay away from this individual”

📈 Course Ease

80/100

“Do not i repeat do not take classes with Cesar Jacobo in the Automotive Department”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of the .
  • knows his stuff and is willing to .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Concern

  • he coughed in my face repeatedly in class in front of everyone
  • stay away from this individual

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

available, and they conflict strongly.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTO1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values