AI Rate Professor

Health Occupations

Russ Lobue

HSMED · HO9 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want serious medical preparation and can handle a tough, fast-moving class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard but career-focusedRequires anatomy backgroundHelpful preparationHospital internshipHigh failure risk
  • The course is demanding and without anatomy experience.
  • Students say the work prepares them well for certification and emergency room practice.
  • Success depends on serious commitment, not just wanting the certificate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears difficult because tests are hard and students .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is challenging, especially for students without anatomy experience.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

The internship requirement suggests limited flexibility, though .

Only in-person comments mention the weekly hospital ER internship.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

but warn that it is not suitable for casual certificate seekers.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and failure warnings suggest strict grading or a demanding pass standard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The and a weekly three-hour ER internship for ten weeks.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

He is seen as helpful and worthwhile, but students may struggle to keep up.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Student comments emphasize hard online tests and certification preparation more than assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but worthwhile medical course with .

Main concern

Students without anatomy experience may struggle or fail.

What students said

“Tough class. but he's really hard to keep up with if you don't have anatomy experience.”
HSMED
“ but they prepare you to pass the NREMT w/o fail.”
HO9

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention hard online tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or webcam requirements.

Hard Online TestsCertification Preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or webcam requirements.

Hard Online TestsCertification Preparation
“ but they prepare you to pass the NREMT w/o fail.”
HO9

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tough class. but he's really hard to keep up with if you don't have anatomy experience.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in difficulty and medical preparation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Value

60/100

“Very interesting class, esp if your interested in pursue a career in the medical field.”

📈 Difficulty

35/100

“you will probably fail his course.”

🧪

45/100

“ but they prepare you to pass the NREMT w/o fail.”

Theme 1

📚 About Difficulty

  • Tough class.
  • he's really hard to keep up with if you don't have anatomy experience.

Theme 2

🏥 About Career Preparation

  • You'll have to "intern" for 3 hrs once a week for 10 wks at a hospital ER.
  • but they prepare you to pass the NREMT w/o fail.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but both give specific and consistent course details.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HO91 review
HSMED1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values