AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Emily Sedgwick

PHIL100 · PHI11 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her only if you can handle unclear structure and while .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaringUnclear expectationsHard to followHeavy workloadStudent-friendly exams
  • Students say she cares and is sweet, but lectures and .
  • The class can feel hard and overloaded, especially when communication is inconsistent.
  • Exam format appears student-friendly in one review, with and an .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and an open-notes final help, but and heavy workload keep the A from feeling easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course feels difficult because students report , and lectures that are .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Students appreciate her caring attitude, but and heavy workload make the experience highly dependent on learning style.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Take-home and open-notes assessments suggest some grading support, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

One review directly calls the class hard and overloaded, and another mentions multiple required books.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is caring and willing to help, but students report , and hard-to-follow lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and required books, suggesting a mix of reading and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but the course can be unclear, , and overloaded.

Main concern

Students and inconsistent communication.

What students said

“The class is hard and overload.”
PHI11
“Lectures are .”
PHIL100
“ ! .”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and an open-notes final, which is student-friendly.

Take-Home TestsOpen Notes Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and an open-notes final, with no clear proctoring details.

Take-Home TestsOpen Notes Final
“ ! .”
PHIL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Cares about the students. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Lectures are .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“The class is hard and overload.”

📝

84/100

“ ! .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Cares about the students.
  • Lectures are .
  • Took me half the semester to get her style of teaching.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty & Workload

  • The class is hard and overload.
  • No text book, she does require you to get 3 paperback books.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • ! .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though both contain useful detail and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHI111 review
PHIL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values