AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

Randy Mees

ENGT116 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

if you want a clear, patient instructor who makes practical engineering technology feel manageable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCrystal ClearPatientHighly RecommendedPractical ExperienceCaring
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Randy Mees as , and deeply supportive.
  • The course is practical and manageable, with and tests.
  • Students repeatedly recommend him and say he cares about their performance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A seems very realistic because homework and tests are straightforward and the instructor gives strong support, though effort still matters.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

83/100

Students describe the class as , and easy to follow with his guidance.

, and it consistently describes the course as manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

The in-person reviews discuss class experience but do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students repeatedly and because , and invested in learning.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report and tests, strong help, and a realistic path to an A+ if they learn the material.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Work appears manageable because homework and tests are described as straightforward and the class atmosphere is relaxed.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Reviews repeatedly call , and one of the best instructors students have had.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention straightforward homework and and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive and , and manageable assessments.

Main concern

Some students note the class gap or strict teaching style, but these are minor compared with the praise.

What students said

“ , but keeps class moving during lecture time.”
ENGT116
“ and the .”
ENGT116
“ .”
ENGT116

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say tests are straightforward, but they do not .

Straightforward TestsStraightforward Homework

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention straightforward tests and open-book policy.

Straightforward TestsStraightforward Homework
“ and the .”
ENGT116

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the .Very professional, precise & crystal clear.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, support, practical value, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

86/100

“If you want to know your stuff as well as an A+...Go MEES!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but keeps class moving during lecture time.
  • His ways of
  • Randy is an awesome teacher.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support And Character

  • gives 100% effort does not give up on you
  • He really cares about his student's perfomance & always willing to help & accomodate you.
  • All around good teacher and person.

Theme 3

📐 About Practical Learning

  • Very practical, not just theory.
  • and the .
  • The atmosphere in the class is really relaxed and comfortable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 10 in-person reviews are detailed, consistent, and strongly aligned across multiple years.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGT11610 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values