AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Clayton Kradjian

PHIL204 · PHIL206 · PHIL106 · PHIL102 · PHIL · PHIL100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want an engaging philosophy class with low workload and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting lecturesVery kindEasy examsLow workloadHelpful reviews
  • Students consistently describe him as kind, interesting, and knowledgeable.
  • , though wording can make some tests harder.
  • Workload appears light, but missing class can hurt because lectures and reviews matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A looks fairly easy because and the workload is light, though a few students say attendance and tricky wording matter.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course content is usually approachable because and interesting, though philosophy and logic are not effortless for every student.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

67/100

, but students warn that missing class can hurt because reviews and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students recommend him because , and keeps the class manageable.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

because students repeatedly mention easy exams, short tests, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

85/100

Workload is light because students mention very little work and learning without heavy outside effort.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Teaching quality is strong because most students describe him as interesting, caring, knowledgeable, and helpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment appears exam-focused because reviews repeatedly discuss quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing engaging lectures, kindness, low workload, and .

Main concern

Some students found him boring or .

What students said

“ because it's easy and he really makes things interesting.”
PHIL204
“His exams were very easy cause he would always review the short too.”
PHIL100
“He will teach you everything you need to know, with very little work.”
PHIL106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally student-friendly because he reviews material in detail, though .

Easy ExamsDetailed Exam ReviewsShort ExamsSome Tricky Wording

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

one concern about tricky wording.

Easy ExamsDetailed Exam ReviewsShort ExamsSome Tricky Wording
“His exams were very easy cause he would always review the short too.”
PHIL100
“ but he reveiws everything in detail”
PHIL102
“His wording on the but he reviews everything the day before.”
PHIL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will teach you everything you need to know, with very little work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is a perfect example of a good teacher that teaches and practices what he teaches.”

👍 Recommendation Level

91/100

“ and his materials are pretty interesting. he is also a ! !”

📘 Workload Value

85/100

“You will learn alot without even trying.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really interesting professor.
  • His lectures were interesting and funny at times.
  • He knows his STUFF!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • they're really easy.
  • Not an easy A but not a bad class anyway.
  • Logic wasn't an easy subject for me, but he offers a lot of help.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is so sweet and kind.
  • very nice teacher.
  • he is also a !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has 12 reviews with consistent themes, but most comments are old and some are brief.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1005 reviews
PHIL1062 reviews
PHIL2042 reviews
PHIL1 review
PHIL1021 review
Show 1 more courses
PHIL2061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values