AI Rate Professor

English

. Peralta

ENGL246B · ENGLI100 · ENG246 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENG246B · ENGL100 · ENG200 · ENG246A · ENG100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take her if you can stay organized and self-advocate, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy workloadHelpful feedbackMixed communicationConfusing expectationsMostly lenient grading
  • Many students found the class easy if they completed the work.
  • Positive reviews praise her feedback, help, and .
  • Negative reviews report lost , and occasional hard grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most comments say the class is easy if you do the work, but a .

All authoritative counts classify the evidence as in person, even though some review bodies describe online sections.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course is generally described as easy and manageable, though some essay topics and directions can be hard.

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format counts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

One review says students only had to meet twice, but .

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format counts.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and , but inconsistent communication creates risk.

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format counts.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Several students say grades are chill or easy with completed work, but one reports receiving a D despite positive comments.

Format shift

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format counts.

Workload

Light

78/100

Many reviews describe the class as easy and manageable, with the main work centered on essays and reading.

Format shift

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format counts.

Teaching experience

Average

63/100

Her feedback and helpfulness are strong in positive reviews, but and .

Format shift

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format counts.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and a research paper rather than exams.

Format shift

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format counts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The in-person-coded evidence is mixed but leans positive, with many students calling the class easy and helpful while and poor communication.

Main concern

Expectations and communication can be inconsistent.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL100
“a HORRIBLE teacher, loses assignments and says i never turned them in, never gets back to emails.”
ENG100
“ and lets you know what mistakes you made and how to correct them.”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and reviews do not clearly prove exam proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book exams.

Research Paper FinalEssay-Based WorkReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-coded reviews mention a research paper as the final and essay-based assignments, with .

Research Paper FinalEssay-Based Work
“There was a she preps you for very well.”
ENGL100
“ .”
ENGLISH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and lets you know what mistakes you made and how to correct them; also lets you revise an essay.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

63/100

“ and lets you know what mistakes you made and how to correct them; also lets you revise an essay.”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“Very easy, helpful, nice prof. be.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

38/100

“a HORRIBLE teacher, loses assignments and says i never turned them in, never gets back to emails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and lets you know what mistakes you made and how to correct them.
  • .
  • She gets you to think in class and to analyze writing better.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • As long as you make the and interesting, you get an A.
  • she grades hard. i had her for an online class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • never gets back to emails, horribly confusing with how she wants stuff done
  • She is usually quick in responding.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across several years provide consistent themes, though some comments are old and format labels conflict with review text.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL1004 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENG2462 reviews
ENG246B2 reviews
ENG2001 review
Show 5 more courses
ENG246A1 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGL246B1 review
ENGLI1001 review
ENGLISH1031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1