AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

. Wissa

ENGT131138256 · ENGT257 · ENGT259 · ENGT138 · ENGT131 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you can learn the material mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid If PossibleConfusing LecturesSelf Teaching RequiredWeak Subject MasteryHard to Understand
  • Most students .
  • Students repeatedly say lectures are hard to understand and lack substance.
  • The course may not always be intellectually hard, but students feel .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A decent grade may be possible, but students describe the real cost as heavy self-teaching and poor instructional support.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The material may be basic in some classes, but should.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , though comments imply class meetings provide limited learning value.

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because they cannot understand him and feel he does not teach the material effectively.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Reviews focus on poor , and limited grade data .

Format shift

discussion.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The , but students report heavy hidden workload from teaching themselves the material.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students repeatedly say lectures are hard to understand, unhelpful, and lacking subject mastery.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention programming, AutoCAD work, and a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students say they often must teach themselves because .

What students said

“ ”
ENGT138
“just be prepared to teach yourself the whole thing”
ENGT259

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a final project but do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenFinal Project Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove an .

Final Project MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“he is asking us to do a ”
ENGT138

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“just be prepared to teach yourself the whole thing”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“No substance in his lectures, just be prepared to teach yourself the whole thing”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ”

📈 Difficulty Reality

35/100

“Class would be alot easier if he knew what he was talking about!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are hard to understand and .
  • No substance in his lectures
  • lectures are really boring

Theme 2

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • Avoid if you can
  • .

Theme 3

🧠 About Self Teaching

  • Have to learn to program by myself.
  • You just learn by doing it yourself.
  • just be prepared to teach yourself the whole thing

Theme 4

📚 About Course Experience

  • Think most of the class knows the program better than he does.
  • This course was the into and .
  • he has not taught us anything about it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews over several years show a highly consistent negative pattern with specific repeated complaints.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENGT1389 reviews
ENGT1312 reviews
ENGT1311382561 review
ENGT2571 review
ENGT2591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values