AI Rate Professor

Electrical Engineering

Ken Hanson

EL200 · EL100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if available, but rely on current course information because the review evidence is very limited.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHighly respectedPositive teaching impressionLimited evidence
  • One detailed review is strongly positive about the learning experience.
  • There is .
  • The ratings are high, but the data is old and very thin.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The low average difficulty suggests manageable effort, but comments give no direct proof of .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course seems not very difficult based on ratings, but comments do not describe the content challenge.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

because one student gives very high praise, while the evidence base is tiny.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

There is , so leniency cannot be confirmed beyond the low difficulty rating.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Workload appears manageable from difficulty ratings, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

One student describes him as one of the , but the second review adds no detail.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment methods are not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but too sparse to prove specific course patterns.

Main concern

The main concern is that one review has no usable detail.

What students said

“One of the learning from”
EL100
“No Comments”
EL200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the learning from”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching impression and evidence limits; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“One of the learning from”

📉 Evidence Limits

28/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Impression

  • One of the learning from
  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and one contains no useful detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EL1001 review
EL2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values