AI Rate Professor

English

A Siegel

ENG20 · ENGL20 · ENG52 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing TeachingVery DifficultPoorly OrganizedAvoided by Students
  • Most students describe the teaching method and syllabus as very hard to understand.
  • The course can .
  • The only mild positive note says it is easier if students follow samples.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting a good result appears possible only with heavy self-direction and careful use of samples.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students describe the writing methods, syllabus, and assignments as .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly because the and frustrating.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students mention passing only with extreme effort, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Several reviews say the class requires very hard work to understand essays and assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most reviews describe the teaching as .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on essays, writing methods, syllabus issues, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

teaching, strange writing methods, and heavy effort.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say the teaching methods and syllabus are hard to understand.

What students said

“The way that he teaches is so weird and difficult to understand.If ...”
ENGL20
“ !”
ENG52
“the class is Very difficult and he does not use mla.”
ENG20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the in school.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in teaching clarity and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“The way that he teaches is so weird and difficult to understand.If ...”

⚠️ Course Difficulty

22/100

“the class is Very difficult and he does not use mla.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his methods of teaching is very difficult to understand.
  • He is very hard to understand his teaching methods are STRANGE.
  • His syllabus is like a foreign language, and his writing methods are preposterous.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Effort

  • I passed his class but had to work extremly hard to understand what he assigned for the essays.
  • you will work Very hard to learn lessons that aren't relevant anywhere else.
  • Easy if you follow samples

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews show a consistent negative pattern, but they are old and some are brief.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG524 reviews
ENG202 reviews
ENGL201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values