AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Doug Haynes

AJ101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle some difficulty, but the evidence is too thin for a strong prediction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGood TeacherSomewhat HardLimited Evidence
  • One review calls him a great teacher, while another says he was hard but okay.
  • The difficulty appears moderate rather than extreme.
  • Evidence is very limited and old.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

There is , and one student directly says the class was hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course seems moderately challenging based on the brief comment that he was hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

The comments are positive overall, but too brief to support a .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, so grading appears unknown to fair rather than clearly lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not described, but the class is called hard by one student.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students describe him as great or okay, with no detailed complaints about teaching quality.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are positive overall but .

Main concern

The sample is only two short reviews.

What students said

“GREAT TEACHER!!”
AJ101
“he was hard...but an ok teacher”
AJ101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he was hard...but an ok teacher”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“GREAT TEACHER!!”

📈 Difficulty Balance

60/100

“he was hard...but an ok teacher”

👍 Recommendation Signal

75/100

“GREAT TEACHER!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • GREAT TEACHER!!
  • he was hard...but an ok teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • he was hard...but an ok teacher
  • GREAT TEACHER!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short reviews are available, both from 2009 to 2010.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AJ1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values