AI Rate Professor

Engineering Technology

Pete Moraga

ENGT138 · ENGT0168 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want a clear, low-stress in-person AutoCAD or engineering technology course.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGood InstructorNot BoringAutoCAD FriendlyRecommendedLow Difficulty
  • Students describe him as a good and engaging instructor.
  • The course appears low difficulty based on ratings and comments.
  • Evidence is positive but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Very low difficulty ratings suggest an A should be attainable with normal effort, but comments .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students found the class low-stress and not boring, with very low reported difficulty.

Only in-person reviews support this course easiness judgment.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Students recommend him because he is a good, decent instructor who keeps the class engaging.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Difficulty is very low, but comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

No heavy workload is reported, and difficulty ratings are very low.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students call him a good teacher and good instructor, though one says he is not the best.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as good, decent, and not boring.

Main concern

Evidence is thin and old, so confidence is limited.

What students said

“He's a very good teacher. It wasn't boring either.”
ENGT0168
“He's a good instructor. Not the best but pretty decent compared to the rest.”
ENGT138

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's a very good teacher. It wasn't boring either.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He's a very good teacher. It wasn't boring either.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ !!!”

📉 Low Difficulty

82/100

“He's a good instructor. Not the best but pretty decent compared to the rest.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's a very good teacher. It wasn't boring either.
  • He's a good instructor. Not the best but pretty decent compared to the rest.

Theme 2

👍 About Recommendation

  • I'd reccomend to anyone wanting to learn autoCAD
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though both are generally consistent and positive.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGT01681 review
ENGT1381 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values