AI Rate Professor

English

Anya Booker

ENG100 · ENG240 · ENG52 · ENGL100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can tolerate disorganization and a heavy writing load for limited guidance.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedHeavy papersUnclear helpPoor communicationHigh effort
  • Most reviews criticize organization, clarity, communication, and course structure.
  • The workload is heavy for the course level, especially reading and long papers.
  • One student learned a lot and earned an A, but only after heavy effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but students , and intense effort rather than easy grading.

All evidence is from in-person-classified reviews, including one comment that says the section was online.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels harder than expected because of , and disorganization.

, so no online comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

A final-day no-show complaint implies fixed meeting requirements, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because the class is disorganized, unclear, and workload-heavy.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

because students mention high expectations, heavy papers, and surprise at earning an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Workload is heavy, with multiple books, many papers, projects, and a long paper in an introductory class.

Format shift

Only in-person-classified reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most students describe Booker as , and poor at communication.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment evidence centers on books, projects, and many papers rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person, and the tone is mostly negative due to disorganization, poor communication, and heavy writing.

Main concern

Students report , and too many papers.

What students said

“ ”
ENG240
“ !!”
ENG52
“she demanded way too much out of a ENG. 100 class.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Final MentionedNo Clear Exam PolicyPaper-Heavy Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, open-book rules, proctoring, or quiz structure.

Final MentionedNo Clear Exam Policy
“she specifically told us to show up on a certain day for the final and she never showed up”
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and made me lose a little interest on the subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She isn't the clearest or most helpful teacher ever.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“We read 3 books are wrote a . One had to be ~12 pages long.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

20/100

“If i would have known, i would not have taken her class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and made me lose a little interest on the subject.
  • She isn't the clearest or most helpful teacher ever.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She expects alot from her students.
  • I learned so much in her class, but I definitely worked my butt off.
  • !!

Theme 3

📨 About Communication

  • a timely fashion
  • she never showed up; .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are recent within the same period and mostly consistent, but one has no comment and details are uneven.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1003 reviews
ENG2401 review
ENG521 review
ENGL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values