AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marianna Jagodina

MATH40 · MATH20 · MATH60 · MATH140 · MATH80B · MATH100 · MATH80A · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her only if and tolerate inconsistent grading for the chance of .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit AvailableInconsistent GradingUnclear LecturesHelpful After ClassHomework Heavy
  • Students split sharply between helpful support and .
  • helps grades, but grading changes and .
  • Math-struggling students may need tutoring or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

can help, but students still report lots of , and inconsistent grading.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The course content is manageable for some students, but and skipped steps make the math feel harder.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students recommend her only conditionally because helpfulness and are offset by confusing teaching and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

suggests some leniency, but and a claimed cap on A grades limit confidence.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Several students mention lots of homework and needing outside tutoring or study time.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is helpful when asked, but repeated comments say lectures are unclear or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and tests, with exams carrying meaningful risk.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a teacher who offers help and but and inconsistent.

Main concern

Unclear explanations and .

What students said

“ if prompted, and always willing to stay after class to help with whatever questions.”
MATH140
“Gives a lot of & a lot of hw.”
MATH140
“ out the semester”
MATH80B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

some surprise problems and weak study guide alignment.

Surprise ProblemsTests From NotesUnclear Exam Preparation

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and surprise problems, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Surprise ProblemsTests From Notes
“ .”
MATH140
“STUDY NOTES AND YOU WILL PASS.”
MATH40
“the .”
MATH140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if prompted, and always willing to stay after class to help with whatever questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ .”

⚖️

50/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“Gives a lot of & a lot of hw.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was tough at first but u get the hang on things..
  • .
  • She stays late when possible.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Gives a lot of .
  • Very simple class, just study notes and you are set.
  • she actually said she cant have more than 5 "A's" in her trig class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risks

  • out the semester
  • STAY AWAY FROM THIS "INSTRUCTOR"
  • Study guides don't really help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve in-person reviews over several years give consistent , and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1403 reviews
MATH402 reviews
MATH80A2 reviews
MATH80B2 reviews
MATH1001 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH201 review
MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values