AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Erin Anderson

PSYC101 · PSY210 · PSY101 · PSYCH101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesHard TestsSelf-Study RequiredAttendance CountedMixed Experiences
  • Reviews are polarized, with a few students praising her but many calling the .
  • Tests and quizzes are described as demanding, detailed, or disconnected from instruction.
  • Students often rely on the textbook, study guide, or self-teaching to succeed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A few students found grade strategies, but , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Intro psychology content becomes challenging because lectures are described as , and poorly aligned with tests.

All course difficulty evidence is in person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and another says she may drop students for missing too many days.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Negative reviews dominate because students , and weak instruction.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report difficult tests, strict expectations, and one withdrawal after earning a D.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not always described as huge, but , and heavy studying create steady pressure.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Several students say she is unprepared, late, unclear, or makes errors, despite a few strong positive reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Tests and and assignments used to prepare.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a high-risk class with , and inconsistent teaching quality.

Main concern

Students complain that lectures are unprepared, late, or not aligned with tests.

What students said

“ the test.”
PSY210
“I used the book a lot and taught myself.”
PSYCH101
“ !!”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and long quizzes, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Hard TestsLong QuizzesStudy Guide Based Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention hard tests, 50-question quizzes, and study-guide-based questions, but .

Hard Tests50 Question QuizzesStudy Guide Based Questions
“her ?quizzes? are 50 questions long.”
PSY101
“ ”
PSY101
“all the !”
PSYC101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I used the book a lot and taught myself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, testing, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“ and unprepared.”

🧪

30/100

“ !!”

👍 Recommendation Level

36/100

“I do not recommend you take Professor Erin Anderson.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't know statistics.
  • She is a great teacher, made her lecture interesting.
  • She really knows her stuff.

Theme 2

📈

  • the test.
  • You can keep re-submitting the quizzes 2 get a higher score

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Structure

  • She?s never on time
  • Keeps canceling class
  • No office hours... no student-teacher interaction

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

but polarized evidence, with several detailed complaints and a few strong positives.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSY1013 reviews
PSYC1012 reviews
PSYCH1012 reviews
PSY2101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values