AI Rate Professor

Health Occupations

Lynn Breegle

HO56 · PHAM50 · PHARM400 · PHARM50 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

if you want a , and very forgiving in-person health occupations instructor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and HelpfulClear ExplanationsVery EasyHighly RecommendedLenient Grading
  • Students consistently describe Breegle as caring, funny, helpful, and easy to understand.
  • The course appears very manageable, with low difficulty and strong support for homework and math.
  • still get a shot at an A after mistakes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Getting an A sounds very attainable because students describe very low difficulty, strong help, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Students say he makes pharmacy material and math easy to understand, so the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and knowledgeable.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

because one student says mistakes still leave a shot at an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

85/100

Students mention homework help but .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Every review praises his teaching, help, personality, or clarity.

Format shift

Teaching quality evidence is entirely in-person and consistently positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and pharmacy math help but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are uniformly excellent and , and strong help outside class.

Main concern

The evidence is old, but the comments are highly consistent.

What students said

“he made things easy to understand.”
PHARM400
“he still will give you a shot at an A grade still”
PHARM50
“ .”
HO56

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You can't go wrong with this guy. , and knowledgeable. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“he made things easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Level

98/100

“ !!”

⚖️

95/100

“even if you screw up on everything he still will give you a shot at an A grade still”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Breegle Is a fun and .
  • he made things easy to understand.
  • , and knowledgeable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Helps a tremendously with pharm. math.
  • even if you screw up on everything he still will give you a shot at an A grade still

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • he is still willing to stay after class and help anyone with if they need it.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews are consistent and detailed, but they are old and lack modern course policy information.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HO562 reviews
PHAM501 review
PHARM4001 review
PHARM501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values