AI Rate Professor

Pharmacy

Daniel Bowman

PHAR50 · PHAR60 · PHARM60 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you value a , but expect uneven organization and mixed classroom quality.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpfulClear When OrganizedDisorganized ClassesMixed Teaching Quality
  • Students and very unprepared experiences.
  • Positive reviews describe him as , and easy to work with.
  • , and PowerPoint-heavy teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

Two reviews report low difficulty, but the negative review reports high difficulty and no comment proves an easy A.

and is mixed across courses.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The class is often described as direct and low difficulty, though disorganization can make it harder.

comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Students .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and helpful, while one review says he makes many mistakes.

Only in-person evidence exists, and opinions differ sharply within that format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Difficulty ratings are mostly low, but reviews give no direct evidence of .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Workload

Light

65/100

The class is described as to the point and generally low difficulty, with no workload complaints.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, with no online workload comparison.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent because students praise his helpfulness but also report disorganization and mistakes.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

for helpfulness and strong criticism of mistakes and disorganization.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent organization and preparation.

What students said

“ and helpful.”
PHAR60
“ and is great to work with and very helpful.”
PHARM60
“doesn't know what he's doing, makes many mistakes!”
PHAR50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Danial was is one of . and is great to work with and very helpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ and is great to work with and very helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Signal

58/100

“ .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

38/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful.
  • Reads too much from powerpoints in class.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Experience

  • The class is to the point yet fun still... .
  • doesn't know what he's doing, makes many mistakes!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium-low because there are only three old reviews, but they contain specific and conflicting evidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHAR501 review
PHAR601 review
PHARM601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values