AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Jovana Ramos

SOC1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you can self-teach and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkConfusing LecturesLecture Access ProblemsHarder Than Needed
  • Both in-person reviews say the class is harder than necessary and difficult to keep up with.
  • Students specifically criticize lecture access and lecture clarity as major problems.
  • There is no online review evidence and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

No student reports earning an A, and both reviews describe the class as hard to keep up with.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students say the class is already hard and becomes harder because .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it consistently describes the course as difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students describe the professor as making the class harder than needed and causing confusion.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is harsh, and no completed grade confirms outcomes.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, with .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Both reviews and and difficulty keeping up.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students say lectures are delayed, missing, or .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The clearest assessment pressure is work and homework, while .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it mentions work rather than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe a difficult class made worse by delayed or missing lectures and content.

Main concern

Students struggle to keep up because lecture materials are delayed, missing, or not aligned with what is discussed.

What students said

“i think this class is harder then it actually needs to be”
soc1a
“she talks about things not on lectures to so i get lost in the lecture.”
soc1a

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the format, or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this class and i think this teacher is making it harder then it needs to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in lecture clarity, workload, and course difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“she talks about things not on lectures to so i get lost in the lecture.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“i think this class is harder then it actually needs to be”

👎 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“this class and i think this teacher is making it harder then it needs to be.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she does not upload the lectures so it is difficult for me to keep up with this class.
  • she talks about things not on lectures to so i get lost in the lecture.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • i think this class is harder then it actually needs to be
  • this class and i think this teacher is making it harder then it needs to be.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only two reviews, but they are recent and strongly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

soc1a2 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1